Monday, June 15, 2015

Reflections from Noam Chomsky’s Dialogue with Krauss






Noam Chomsky, the respected intellectual, linguist, philosopher and historian discusses some of the biggest problems we face today with Professor Krauss, a reputable physician in his own right. It seems that Noam Chomsky is something of an icon, a symbol, a beacon, if you will, of hope among the intellectual community. His entrance on stage causes an eruption of applause, perhaps even standing ovations from members of the floor, an audience of professors, historians, linguists, philosophers, lecturers and people of reasonable intellectual capacities. He is dressed in faded blue jeans and a shirt under the sweater. His hair a silvery white, it’s a clear depiction of his advanced age. Yet despite his age, Noam Chomsky reveals, much to the lack of surprise to everyone, that his mind is as brilliant as it has ever been. Throughout the entire dialogue, Noam Chomsky skilfully dissects the issues at hand and gives diagnosis, prognosis and even suggests cures to some of the biggest dilemmas faced by modern man. It is not easy to grasp the severity of some of the world’s problems, what more to provide an accurate analysis, in the short period of one’s life. If it was, then many men and women would have been produced as intellectuals. In this regard, Noam Chomsky stands as living proof that man indeed can embody significant capacity for creative problem solving of the highest order. His arguments were not done through persuasion; which he insists is hallmark of good teachers, but instead is propelled by leading the listener to consider a problem and then allowing that person to figure it out on their own. His methodology, as he explains, is based on the school of thought that believes in showing the listener a string and allowing the cultivation of curiosity, inquiry and discovery by following where it leads to, so as to leave a significant mark on the student’s intellectual development. 

Much to the delight of many, he advocates that intellectuals are responsible for challenging notions, ideas and assumptions that bombard us constantly and which might lead us to make conclusions by the force of others. He exerts that the old school of “pouring” the learning into the vesicle is akin to persuasion or rhetoric, which great teachers need not rely on to impart knowledge to the listening student. He further explains that he finds it fascinating that people would look to the validity of arguments through persuasive rhetoric alone, without careful consideration for what exactly is being said. The conversation is akin to a seamless tapestry of interesting anecdotes and frequently punctuates itself with statements revealing Chomsky’s humility as an intellectual like “I think that’s a substantiated statement”. As he began the dialogue, the conversation naturally shifted to the field of linguistics, something Mr Chomsky is all too familiar with. He begins by showing how language as a medium of curiosity and discovery can be so integral to our everyday life. The conversation leads the listener to ecstatic discovery of the external and internal mechanisms of language. He shows us that between that between the external space of sentence structure, morphology, punctuation and other linguistic devices, lies the unseen yet even more important internal process of comprehension that can give life to human communication. His brilliant arguments are almost always substantiated with case studies from history, or experiments conducted by other notables. One might argue that Noam Chomsky could probably one of the greatest intellectuals of our time, considering just how much he is being referenced to by the community of thinkers. 

Professor Kraus and Professor Chomsky’s discussion point then to the idea of just how complex human language is just by studying the communication of bees and other creatures. At one time, Professor Kraus asked Professor Chomsky for his explanation for his statement, “Persuasion itself can be a form of violence”, which Professor Chomsky coolly answers that so long as one is trying to convince another through persuasion then that method is an ineffective path to learning. For, it is the individual who needs to consider the hypotheses with proper reasoning and not the teacher who spoon-feeds what is regarded as truths. In this way, the student learns to be a mathematician instead of a collector of other people’s ideas. Professor Chomsky is quick to reveal his work in foreign policy and how he vehemently spoke against the American’s involvement in the Vietnam war. He highlights how America got itself into a war by force, largely due to the persuasion of the Bush administration and rhetoric. He further goes on to say that what is considered as a ‘war crime’ is exclusively only used if the United States’s own crimes would not be accentuated. Thus, something that the Nazi’s did which would be considered as a ‘war crime’ would not be taken into account if the United States had also committed such an act. 

Professor Chomsky left the audience startled at many of his efforts to unveil the consequences of American foreign policies. One of them which he alluded to was the rampage of ISIS which we face today. He argued that ISIS is the result of the foreign policies’ backlash over the years and which arguably may leave Syria without any hope of recovering from the destruction. Finally, close to the end of the conversation, Professor Chomsky speaks about climate change. He expresses concern over what kind of world our grandchildren might be living in if the current trends continue. Overall, it was a remarkable sight to see these two intellectuals having open and informed dialogue about ideas which were sometimes contrary to one another. I hope for more reflections like these in the near future to see just what the brightest minds are engaged in so that the same sort of higher order thinking can be used to solve the problems facing the Ummah today. Insya Allah Ameen.